Site drawings, measuring tools, material samples and a closed laptop on a planning desk.
A pro forma connects the physical proposal to its financial assumptions.

What to take into your next appraisal

  • Use comparable Warsaw leases or listings with their evidence status disclosed.
  • Separate base rent, service charges, utilities and concessions.
  • Confirm tax and currency treatment for the actual ownership and letting structure.

Build a Warsaw rent evidence set

Narodowy Bank Polski publishes reports on major-city housing and commercial property markets, alongside its BaRN house-price database. The quarterly catalogue cautions that the reports are not investment advice and that database figures can be revised. Use them as dated market context, not a direct quote for a specific rental building.

For the rent input, obtain local lease or listing evidence with district, size, furnishing, date, asking-versus-achieved status and included charges. A national housing-stock publication cannot establish a Warsaw apartment’s achievable rent.

Sources: Narodowy Bank Polski: Real estate market: quarterly reports and BaRN database; Statistics Poland: Housing Economy and Municipal Infrastructure

Make the evidence comparable

Suppose a fictional research exercise contains a PLN 4,000 monthly all-in quote including PLN 600 of recoverable service charges, and another quote of PLN 3,400 base rent with charges separate. Both imply PLN 3,400 base rent before other differences. They are invented examples, not observed Warsaw listings.

Adjust or reject evidence with different lease lengths, furnishing, utility treatment or incentives. Retain the original quote alongside each adjustment so a reviewer can challenge the proposed base rent.

Reconcile a fictional 100-apartment year

Assume 100 apartments at PLN 3,500 monthly base rent and 95% economic occupancy. Effective base rent is PLN 3.99m a year. Deduct PLN 1.2m of landlord operating costs to produce PLN 2.79m NOI. Recoverable charges are assumed to offset their matching expenses exactly and are excluded from both sides.

If the owner instead bears a further PLN 300,000 of unrecovered service costs, NOI falls to PLN 2.49m. At an illustrative 6% capitalisation rate, values are PLN 46.5m and PLN 41.5m respectively: a PLN 5m difference.

Create a transaction-specific research checklist

Ask Polish advisers to confirm acquisition VAT or civil-law transaction-tax treatment, VAT on the intended letting and ancillary services, input-tax recovery, property taxes and the ownership entity’s income-tax position. Record written conclusions and effective dates; this guide supplies no universal Polish tax rate.

Map each confirmed tax to payment, recovery or permanent cost. A recoverable construction-tax balance can still increase peak equity if refund timing lags invoices.

Report the currency exposure separately

If PLN 2.79m NOI is translated at an assumed PLN 4.30 per euro, it equals approximately €648,837. At PLN 4.60 it equals approximately €606,522, a 6.5% reduction without any change in Polish operating performance. These exchange rates are scenario inputs.

Model debt in its actual currency and state any hedge terms. Present local NOI, local funding and investor-currency returns separately so a currency movement is not mistaken for a change in rental performance.

Sources and further reading

  1. Real estate market: quarterly reports and BaRN database Narodowy Bank Polski
  2. Housing Economy and Municipal Infrastructure Statistics Poland
  3. Discounted cash flow valuations RICS

Published by Feasly. How we prepare our guides. Suggest a correction.