What to take into your next appraisal
- Specify accrual, compounding and payment priority in writing.
- Keep contributed capital separate from the promote.
- Check that every unit of distributed cash reaches exactly one recipient.
Translate the agreement into a tier specification
Before modelling, identify who contributes money or land, whether the land is credited at cost or another agreed value, how preference accrues, and whether distributions are tested deal by deal or across a portfolio. Ask whether unpaid preference compounds, whether capital returned stops accruing preference and whether later losses trigger a clawback.
The waterfall below is an invented commercial agreement. It is not a standard legal structure or a tax conclusion. RICS guidance supports explicit appraisal assumptions and return bases; the actual allocation terms must come from the signed venture documents.
State the complete example rules
One capital investor contributes 10 million at time zero. A sponsor contributes no cash in this deliberately simplified example and receives a promote. Exactly one year later, 14 million is available after project liabilities and debt have been settled. First return the investor's capital, then pay an 8% simple one-year preferred return on that capital.
Next allocate 100% of cash to the sponsor until its catch-up equals 20% of the combined preference and catch-up pool. Finally split remaining cash 80% to the investor and 20% to the sponsor. These rules are chosen to demonstrate a full catch-up. Other agreements use different denominators, partial catch-ups or no catch-up at all.
Calculate and reconcile each distribution tier
Capital return uses 10 million, leaving 4 million. Preference is 0.8 million, leaving 3.2 million. For the catch-up, C / (0.8 + C) = 20%, so C = 0.2 million. The remaining 3 million is split 2.4 million to the investor and 0.6 million to the sponsor.
The investor receives 13.2 million and the sponsor 0.8 million. Their distributions sum to the available 14 million. The sponsor receives 20% of total profit in this particular fully funded example; that outcome follows from the catch-up definition and should not be presumed for a different agreement.
| Tier, million | Investor | Sponsor | Cash remaining |
|---|---|---|---|
| Opening available cash | 0.00 | 0.00 | 14.00 |
| Return capital | 10.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 |
| Preferred return | 0.80 | 0.00 | 3.20 |
| Sponsor catch-up | 0.00 | 0.20 | 3.00 |
| Residual 80/20 split | 2.40 | 0.60 | 0.00 |
| Total distributions | 13.20 | 0.80 | 0.00 |
Test the tiers when cash runs out
With only 10.5 million available at the same date, all capital is returned and 0.5 million is paid toward the 0.8 million preference. No catch-up or residual distribution occurs. The unpaid preference is 0.3 million. Whether it remains due, compounds or expires at liquidation requires the agreement.
For interim distributions, maintain separate balances for unreturned capital, accrued preference, preference paid and sponsor catch-up. Never restart the catch-up calculation independently each period without considering cumulative distributions. Test a partial capital return, a new capital call and a later loss before relying on a multi-period implementation.
Make the waterfall auditable
Give each tier a maximum payable amount, recipient split, funding source and remaining-cash calculation. Floors should prevent negative distributions. Reconcile contributions and distributions by partner and date, then calculate each partner's return from that actual cashflow. The project IRR is not the investor IRR after promote.
A reviewer should be able to reconstruct the worked example from the stated terms without inspecting formulas. Before using a waterfall in a live deal, obtain legal and tax confirmation of the actual agreement and verify whether clawbacks, guarantee payments or transfer taxes introduce additional flows.
Sources and further reading
Published by Feasly. How we prepare our guides. Suggest a correction.
